Sunday, March 17, 2013

"Are you watching Indian Wells?"

This is the time of year when tennis is heating up! As a former player, coach/teaching pro, and fan of the game, this is a time when I would normally be watching what is considered by some to be the "fifth Grand Slam" - i.e., the BNP Paribas Tournament at Indian Wells. But to be honest, I have had difficulty watching that tournament ever since March 17, 2001, when the Williams family faced "one of the ugliest scenes in the sport's history" (Jenkins, 2013, para. 3). From my perspective, I cannot think of an uglier moment!

Now I am an Associate Professor in Sport Management at Bowling Green State University (BGSU), where I teach an undergraduate class about "Sport and Gender" and a graduate course on "Sport and Society." Since the BNP Paribas Tournament occurs midway through the semester, I typically assign articles related to the racialized incident that occurred in 2001. In class, we discuss if and/or how racism operated in that situation, and how students as future sport managers could address racism in sport. For those who are not familiar with what happened at Indian Wells, the incident is documented by Joel Drucker (2009) in this summary.

In 2001, I was among those eagerly awaiting the live televised match that would feature the Williams sisters playing one another professionally for only the sixth time. I remember seeing them play in their first match at the Ericsson (in 1999) when Venus won in three sets. I also watched as Venus defeated Serena in their 2000 semifinal match at Wimbledon. I could not have been more excited to see their sixth match-up, especially since it was scheduled to be shown live on ESPN. Naturally, I was disappointed to learn that Venus had defaulted - supposedly just moments before the match was scheduled to begin. I don't remember if they showed another match to fill in the time slot. But I do remember seeing the finals between Serena Williams and Kim Clijsters when it was played two days later.

Watching that final match left an indelible mark on me, so I can begin to understand how it must have felt for the Williams sisters. Pam Shriver and Mary Joe Fernandez were commentators for the final match. I remember Mary Joe saying that tournament officials knew "something might happen," and they had warned ushers to be prepared. In light of their forewarning, I could not understand why no one intervened when the ugliness began. The vitriolic booing by fans started as soon as Serena was introduced; it escalated when Venus and Richard Williams entered the Stadium to take their seats for the final. As the match got underway, fans did the unthinkable - for a tennis crowd - they booed loudly each time Serena made an error or lost a point. The clip below shows what happened:



After showing this clip in class, we usually discuss whether the Williams sisters should return to Indian Wells. Based upon my observations over the years, I have witnessed a growing consensus among students that Venus and Serena are justified in not returning to Indian Wells. When asked why they believe that, students say that the original incident was never really addressed (i.e., nothing was done at the time) and there is no guarantee that things would be different if they returned to Indian Wells. One student noted that if fans were upset 12 years ago, how do we know that they would not harbor ill will and demonstrate their displeasure even moreso now.

In a powerful article on SI.com, Elizabeth Newman (2013) argues that "Calls for Williams sisters to return to Indian Wells are wrong." Newman explains how unusual it is to display such behavior in tennis, writing, "we're talking about tennis, a sport steeped in etiquette, decorum and protocol; a sport where errant catcalls and whistling are considered low brow" (para. 10). When we discuss the incident in my classes, students often wonder if such behavior ever happens in other tennis matches. I tell them it might happen during hotly-contested Davis Cup matches, although it rarely occurs when a player competes in her own country. I recall seeing fans display their displeasure toward Martina Hingis (after she made comments about Amelie Mauresmo being "half a man"), and toward Serena at the French Open (in a controversial match against Justine Henin in 2003). Most recently, fans expressed their displeasure toward Victoria Azarenka after she took a longer than usual bathroom break at an inopportune moment during her U.S. Open match against Sloane Stephens.

In 2001, several things struck me as I watched the Women's Singles Final at Indian Wells. One was that "no one did anything." When Serena's autobiography, On the line (Williams & Paisner, 2009), came out, I was particularly moved by her chapter on "The fiery darts of Indian Wells." In it Serena wrote that, "Some tournament official could have gotten on the loudspeaker and explained to the fans that Venus had been legitimately hurt, that I had nothing to do with her withdrawal, that every effort had been made to cancel that semifinal match in a more timely manner. Some effort could have been made to quiet the crowd. But no one did anything" (Williams & Paisner, 2009, p. 81). Like Serena, I too was astonished to watch the match and observe that no one did anything!



Another thing that I learned as I read the chapter was that Venus had told the trainer earlier in the day that she was injured and would not be able to play. So why was an announcement not made until four minutes before the match was to begin? At the time, it appeared that Venus was solely responsible for the late withdrawal. To this day, I wonder why the tournament director and/or trainer never acknowledged their complicity in what happened.

In the aftermath of the 2001 Indian Wells final, Richard Williams reported that he heard "racial epithets" and that someone even yelled that he was lucky it was not 1975 or "he would skin him alive" (Smith, 2001, para. 29). Venus heard it. Other fans reported hearing the boos and racist epithets. And yet, Tournament Director Charlie Pasarell's response was simply to say, "If Richard says he heard racist epithets, maybe he did... but I know that's not Indian Wells people." Really? What does that mean? Why was it so important to establish that if there was a racist response from the crowd, it wasn't "Indian Wells' people." It was still racism! Was Pasarell only responsible if Indian Wells' people were yelling epithets?

Since 2001, the Williams sisters have (understandably) not returned to Indian Wells, a decision that I fully support. Yahoo! Sports' Merlisa Lawrence Corbett (2013) writes that the 12-year boycott taints Indian Wells tournament - which is not to suggest that the Williams sisters are to blame, but that Charlie Pasarell never stood against "overt racism." Of the three most recent articles I have mentioned in this entry, Corbett and Newman believe they should continue their boycott, while Jenkins believes that it is time for the Williams sisters to return to Indian Wells. I strongly agree with Corbett and Newman. What do you think?

4 comments:

engineer said...

I think it is interesting that this event is taught in colleges. Another aspect is how the media covered it at the time and how it still slants the coverage to paint the Williams family as at fault. The Drucker article that you linked to is a good example. While getting his facts straight, he ignores other facts like Venus's claim that she called attention to her injury the evening before the semi-final match, that there were no calls for restraint during the final from the tournament director or that numerous fan testimonials since the tournament have backed up the Williams's account of what was said in the crowd. Even the recent SI article suggesting the sisters should return to Indian Wells featured photos of Richard Williams and made very little reference to the ugly crowd verbally assulting a 19 year old in the final. Sounds like you have an interesting topic to teach on and it just keeps growing.

The Tennis Prof Chronicles said...

Hi Engineer,

Sorry I did not reply to your message earlier, but I just came across it. It has been a most interesting subject to talk about in classes. Many times in Sport Management, we have a tendency to glorify sports. And yet, I believe if we are to make sport better, we need to address the negative events that happen. Yet, even those who are avid tennis fans may not have been aware of what happened at Indian Wells in 2001. I study tennis more closely than any other sport since it has been my lifelong passion. And yet, I did not know about the details of Venus' injury until Serena's autobiography came out in 2009. I wondered why all of that information had been obscured until now. I agree with you that we have gotten a very skewed sense of what happened.
Thanks for sharing your insights.

richard dye said...

I believe this blog is proof positive about uhow people's behavior can be unfairly portrayed or demonized to fit a social agenda.

First, to address the ridiculous "racism" calls from Richard Williams....well even the liberal media, and this blogger seem willing to ignore that unsupported call. Richard WIlliams has proven himself to be extremely racist over the years, and certainly somebody who perception of events is often not accurate.

As to the crowd, they had every right to "boo", yes, it was completely predictable - all of us as serious fans knew that would happen, and it was discussed online. It would not matter who the player was, if they had a similar history of shenanigans, and then pulled out in that manner, people would be both suspicious, and displeased - and again, yes, the sports fan will let you know what they think.

The Williams of course, knew this as well, but were more than willing to face that crowd, shake fists, and flaunt their actions - with no heartfelt, genuine attempt to convince people otherwise.

As to the Williams, they did this behavior (which in best case simply looks very bad, and in worst case was another unprofessional move, causing fans and the tournament to be ripped-off), and it is up to them to decide if they come back. Frankly, if I were Pasarell, though I would be hurt by the lack of their star-power, I would not want them back. The tournament, and more importantly, the SPORT, needs PROFESSIONAL players, who show up, and give 100% effort day in, and day out. That certainly was not the Williams sisters.

In fact, subsequent events - later in Serena's career have shown that even a decade later, she isn't above ugly behavior eg. ugly threats against lines-people.

There is no controversy here. The Williams had a history of unsportsmanlike antics - any serious player/coach who saw their earlier matches knows FULL WELL that those matches were not properly competitive - that can't be proven, but again....they were nearly as obviously fixed as the old King-Riggs match, and certainly far more fixed than the majority of exhibition matches. Even the Williams have had to acknowledge that in retrospect - though they tend to claim that was a result of mental problems in the psychology of sibling rivalry. Bottom line: they pulled out in an inappropriate and highly suspicious way (given their history), and people lost the hard-earned money they paid to see what should have been PROFESSIONAL tennis. The Williams either underestimated the fans displeasure, or did not take it seriously. For the young sisters, it was probably a matter of both, for Richard, well he has always come across as an arrogant attention-seeking man, and my personal suspicion is that he reveled in the controversy and his power to create it.

The fans had every right to boo them, and they have every right to not come back.

And let me reiterate, racism is a kludge that Richard Williams added on. It isn't even necessary to explain the incident. I am a visible minority as are many of the die-hard fans who discussed this online. Many of us, dare I say the majority, were in agreement with the booing fans...we certainly psychologically jeered them, for their behavior. If one needs racism to explain this reaction, one either does not understand the situation (or the previous ones leading up to this), or one is disingenuously stretching the incident to match their own social agenda.

Sparkling Wtr said...

Serena Williams and her father Richard Williams have displayed numerous unprofessional behaviors over the years. Anytime they are criticized for their behavior, it is deemed racist. Serena's specific threats of bodily injury to umpires and line people are inappropriate no matter what your race is. Richard's repeatedly dancing the jig on the roof of cordoned off private property and holding up poster boards to confront the crowd is not professional behavior for a manager and coach -- it's an in-your-face action. Unsurprisingly, these types of behaviors engender a reaction the crowd. To act as if comments and commentary about the Williams' family's disrespect for the tennis community is all racially motivated is disrespectful to those of us who appreciate a modicum of professionalism in a sport that still esteems such values. Let's not pretend the Williams family's provocative behavior is blame- free.